Suche löschen...
The photographic news
- Bandzählung
- 6.1862
- Erscheinungsdatum
- 1862
- Sprache
- Englisch
- Signatur
- F 135
- Vorlage
- Hochschule für Grafik und Buchkunst Leipzig
- Digitalisat
- Hochschule für Grafik und Buchkunst Leipzig
- Digitalisat
- SLUB Dresden
- Lizenz-/Rechtehinweis
- Public Domain Mark 1.0
- URN
- urn:nbn:de:bsz:14-db-id1780948042-186200003
- PURL
- http://digital.slub-dresden.de/id1780948042-18620000
- OAI-Identifier
- oai:de:slub-dresden:db:id-1780948042-18620000
- Sammlungen
- Fotografie
- LDP: Historische Bestände der Hochschule für Grafik und Buchkunst Leipzig
- Bemerkung
- Seite 1-72 fehlen in der Vorlage. Vorlagebedingter Textverlust.
- Strukturtyp
- Band
- Parlamentsperiode
- -
- Wahlperiode
- -
- Bandzählung
- No. 203, Juny 25, 1862
- Digitalisat
- SLUB Dresden
- Strukturtyp
- Ausgabe
- Parlamentsperiode
- -
- Wahlperiode
- -
-
Zeitschrift
The photographic news
-
Band
Band 6.1862
-
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 73
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 85
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 97
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 109
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 121
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 133
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 145
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 157
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 169
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 181
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 193
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 205
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 217
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 229
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 241
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 253
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 265
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 277
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 289
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 301
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 313
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 325
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 337
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 349
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 361
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 373
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 385
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 397
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 409
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 421
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 433
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 445
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 457
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 469
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 481
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 493
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 505
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 517
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 529
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 541
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 553
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 565
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 577
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 589
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 601
- Ausgabe Ausgabe 613
- Register Index 619
-
Band
Band 6.1862
-
- Titel
- The photographic news
- Autor
- Links
- Downloads
- Einzelseite als Bild herunterladen (JPG)
-
Volltext Seite (XML)
1862. from It o extnd will te e writer, . fc ind fury our cut legations h, to appte as re never spect it elf seems liar with im credit s phrase, of using iveni to to be a pun was iklycot- mple it iim that I phrass I as "out ary,"ot idgment, I s of our I he well- I ich any pearing ent and ty, To I in Great the pro- here aw rs to the ge they t publica- ized by eriod of I rightly 1 , to the e, avail* i lightest porary) elter o I charge, contew been* • one ft against itempt duty as ible,/ es with ulously otogrk lers we utmost not, it 11 fron itances, > is the | lit the ad the aknow- •eadef rhen 8 ty for July 25, 1862.] THE PHOTOGRAPHIC NEWS. 351 its statements rests upon the original source ; whilst quota tion without acknowledgment transfers the responsibility to him who uses the quotation. Now we must confess we have no such profound faith in our contemporary as would lead as to accept the responsibility of affiliating his articles. If । we had no other reason, we should refer to the source of such I quotations, as indicative of the exact amount of authority they possess. As we have said, we are attacked in a general onslaught, in which our American confreres come in for heavy punish- ments, and our contemporary the Photographic Notes for a timorous side-blow, which is, however, at the same time, aocompanied by an impertinent and patronizing attempt to palliate its force or deprecate rejoinder, in which we detect »me uneasy recollection of our friend Sutton’s hard hitting on former occasions. Both he and our American friends can take care of themselves, and the bickerings of the Liverpool journal with them is no concern of ours. Nor have we ever meddled in the matter. Since, however, we are thus mixed a P in the attack in question, we may make one or two Imarks, The two American journals, in addition to the Yalnable original matter they publish, extract largely and vith much discrimination from European journals. This 8 done, we have pleasure in adding, as a general rule, in a ir and honourable manner, with proper acknowledgment o the source. They have their own method of doing this, tither at the beginning or end of a continued article, so as to avoid repetition. Inadvertent omission may also occur "ith them as with others. For some of these fancied or lcridental omissions, these journals have been the object of of repeated querulous attacks in the pages of our contempo- "ary. Our pages have been laid under contribution in American and other journals, to at least an equal extent; but it has never occurred to us to make this a grievance. Whether the source were acknowledged, or by inadvertence fitted, we have given our contemporaries credit for the best intentions, and have felt glad to know that information calculated to aid the progress of the art was obtaining wider firculation. In the very last number of one of our con- temporaries in this country, an article is reproduced without Aeknowledgment, which had been contributed, to use our ^temporary’s phrase, “ exclusively” to our pages ; but we Sould feel somewhat ashamed of ourselves to cry out about 11 as an intentional evasion or slight. It is one of those C28es in which “ giving impoverishes not, neither does with- lolding enrich.” If our contemporaries gather matter from J?. *e at times glean from them, and thus increased circula- "0n is given to all photographic information of value, and 22 public are the gainers. We believe we are generally y accredited, and we know we always aim at accrediting Blers; and if on either side it be at times omitted, it is Bnobably through oversight, by which we do not know that ii dy is much inj ured. vWith our Liverpool contemporary all this is different. * rarely quote from his pages at all, and when we do so, We have before said, we scrupulously acknowledge the Wree. But there is one other circumstance in connection ath this, to which wo must allude. It so happens that t. one of the photographic societies the editor of our con- tPorary is the constant chairman : in this capacity he charge of, and systematically refuses to ourselves the I mission to copy or make abstracts of the papers read at of meetings. It generally happens that wc receive copies o 8uch papers from the gentlemen who read them ; it has onsionally happened, however, where we have not had haPortunity of communication with the writers, that we has hadto wait to reproduce them until our contemporary inte Published. If the paper has happened to be one of t srait to our readers, we have then inserted it. In regard we aS' papers, which have been read to a society of which which, a member, and at a meeting at which we are present, dotweforbear publishing from reporters’ notes, simply to t<i sl j 111 e st justice to the writers and our readers; in regard 11 papers our contemporary has the audacity to demand from us that we’quote them as from his pages! This, in the one or two instances in which it has occurred, we have declined to do : this we shall decline to do, as by doing it, we should be but offering a premium for narrowness and discourtesy. We have had a tolerably lengthy experience in journalism: we had in early life a somewhat extended experience in reporting meetings of all kinds, and we can unhesitatingly aver that we never met with a similar dis courtesy and similar claim to this on the part of our con temporary. Let us add, that in cases where at any meeting the copy of a paper has first fallen into our hands, we have always hastened to furnish our contemporary with copy without any delay. Let us also state that our contemporary seeks and obtains, in common with ourselves, from the Journal of the Photographic Society, copy of the papers read at its meet ings, for publication contemporaneously with that journal. The editor of the Photographic Journal, with unfailing courtesy, supplies to his contemporaries, copy of papers, to which he could assert a sole claim, his journal being the property of the Society; and our Liverpool contemporary eagerly profits by a courtesy which he is altogether unwilling to extend to others. We hold the conviction that photo graphic journals, as well as photographic societies, should exist for the advancement and diffusion of the art, and that so soon as they lose sight of that as their primary aim, so soon will they deserve to lose what should be their secondary object, individual advantage and trade profit; and, what is more, we believe they will get what they deserve. To eke out his case, our contemporary talks about our quoting from foreign journals without permission or acknow ledgment. To this, as we have before said, we might very properly answer with a tu quoque. We might also, for the satisfaction of our readers, if these explanations and denials had not extended to such a length, enter into more explana tions or denials. But, so far as our contemporary is con cerned, we simply bid him mind his own business. If he did that properly, he would probably have his hands full. Of our arrangements with our contemporaries, he simply knows nothing whatever, nor does the matter concern him. We have already far exceeded the space of which the matter is worthy, simply because we wish to avoid the necessity of further reference to it. We must add one word, however, before we conclude. The question will naturally arise, What are our contemporary’s motives for all this? It is difficult to determine. It may be from the preverted idea held by some that they raise themselves when they try to pull others down. It may be from motives which it might seem egotistic in us to express. It may be that our con temporary has eaten of the insane root, and believes in his own charges ; it is possible to nurse a delusion until it seems true. It may be that a journal having, like a corporation, “ neither a body to be kicked, nor a soul to be saved,” will perpetrate things individuals would shrink from—for per sonally, and apart from journalistic rivalry, we have received many courtesies from all connected with the British Journal. However all this may be, we can simply assure our readers that we shall omit no opportunity of bringing under their notice everything, from every source, which can interest them and promote the art; and that in doing so we shall always endeavour to deserve, not their esteem only, but also to preserve our own self-respect and secure the goodwill of our fellow-labourers in photographic literature. • MR. BEDFORD’S PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE EAST. Mr. Francis Bedford invited his friends, on Tuesday last, to a private view, at the German Gallery, Bond Street, of his Photographs taken during the tour in the East, in which, by command, he accompanied His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales. These pictures are one hundred and seventy-two in number, chiefly on 12 by 10 plates. The entire series will be published in twenty-one parts, each containing eight or
- Aktuelle Seite (TXT)
- METS Datei (XML)
- IIIF Manifest (JSON)